[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0904171336030.14919@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 13:36:58 -0400 (EDT)
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Zhaolei <zhaolei@...fujitsu.com>,
Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@...il.com>,
Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing/lockdep: turn lock->name into an array
On Fri, 17 Apr 2009, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 10:25 -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> > Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > We could zap all pending trace entries on module unload (it is a
> > > rare operation)
> >
> > ....Unless you're trying to trace something across a module unload. I
> > don't know if its at all practical, but it would be nice to just zap the
> > pointers within the buffer, rather than the whole buffer.
>
> I think the new __string() thing that's in the works will avoid the
> whole problem by copying the string into the buffer, instead of keeping
> a reference.
Speaking of which. We have not heard back from Frederic on this yet. I
hope he's taking a break, enjoying the sun, and not stuck on some tricky
macro crap ;-)
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists