[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090418125839.GA3668@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 13:58:39 +0100
From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc: linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
linux arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: kbuild - introduce support for subdir-ccflags-y
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 02:51:59PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> The typical use cases are an architecture or a subsystem that
> decide to cover all files with -Werror.
> Today alpha, mips and sparc uses -Werror in almost all their
> Makefile - with subdir-ccflag-y it is now simpler to do so
> as only the top-level directories needs to be covered.
Hmm, this won't make sense for ARM. We have things like #warning and
deprecated functions in machine specific headers, and adding -Werror
to the whole of arch/arm/ will result in these causing builds to fail.
Adding it just for boot,common,kernel,lib,mm,nwfpe,oprofile,vfp (iow
everything except the mach-* and plat-* directories) would make sense
though.
> The feature is added because the x86 guys are planning
> to (conditionally) cover all of arch/x86/ with -Werrror
> and adding this statement in each single Makefile
> was *the wrong way* to do so.
I think that's the way we're going to _have_ to do it on ARM.
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of:
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists