[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090418201317.GB23229@jurassic.park.msu.ru>
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 00:13:17 +0400
From: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, yannick.roehlly@...e.fr
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/pci: make pci_mem_start to be aligned only -v4
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 09:14:25PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> This way we intentionally create a 'free physical address space'
> hole space that is the same as the rounding logic. No rounding
> needed anywhere - as all the remaining address space is well-rounded
> already. Plus we'd also _see_ all our rounding logic by looking at
> the '(guard)' entries.
>
> Or maybe there's some aspect of gap-rounding that cannot be
> expressed in such a static way?
My gut feeling is that you guys do overcomplicate a simple issue
which can be fixed with a one-liner like this:
pci_mem_start = pci_mem_start < 0xc0000000 ? : 0xc0000000;
This 0xc0000000 (3G) seems to be a pretty fundamental thing for certain
32-bit OS. ;-)
Ivan.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists