[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090418202704.GB30144@elte.hu>
Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 22:27:04 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] driver: dont update dev_name if it is not changed
* Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> wrote:
> Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> >> notice one system /proc/iomem some entries missed the name for pci_devices
> >>
> >> it turns that dev->dev.kobj name is changed after device_add.
> >>
> >> [Impact: fix corrupted names in /proc/iomem ]
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
> >>
> >> ---
> >> lib/kobject.c | 13 +++++++++++--
> >> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> Index: linux-2.6/lib/kobject.c
> >> ===================================================================
> >> --- linux-2.6.orig/lib/kobject.c
> >> +++ linux-2.6/lib/kobject.c
> >> @@ -216,12 +216,21 @@ int kobject_set_name_vargs(struct kobjec
> >> va_list vargs)
> >> {
> >> const char *old_name = kobj->name;
> >> + char *new_name;
> >> char *s;
> >>
> >> - kobj->name = kvasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, fmt, vargs);
> >> - if (!kobj->name)
> >> + new_name = kvasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, fmt, vargs);
> >> + if (!new_name)
> >> return -ENOMEM;
> >>
> >> + /* different ? */
> >> + if (!strcmp(new_name, old_name)) {
> >> + kfree(new_name);
> >> + return 0;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + kobj->name = new_name;
> >> +
> >> /* ewww... some of these buggers have '/' in the name ... */
> >> while ((s = strchr(kobj->name, '/')))
> >> s[0] = '!';
> >
> > So we used the old name in the resource code, and the kfree() here
> > corrupted the /proc/iomem output?
> >
> if it is not changed, we still use old_name. and new_name get freed
I know - you are talking about your patch.
But i'm talking about the current, unpatched upstream code. It got a
string displayed in /proc/iomem that got kfree()d? [and this is why
the entries vanished?]
That is badness somewhere _else_ (not in the kobject core i think),
and your patch does not solve the real badness, it works around its
symptoms AFAICS - like the first patch.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists