linux-kernel - Re: [git pull] Fixes to 2.6.30rc2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20090418.015905.92829818.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Sat, 18 Apr 2009 01:59:05 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	eric@...olt.net
Cc:	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [git pull] Fixes to 2.6.30rc2

From: Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 13:49:59 -0700

>   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/anholt/drm-intel drm-intel-next

Eric, any plans to ever push your work through David Airlie's DRM
tree?  I've been watching this for a few weeks and I'm mystified why
the Intel DRM drier stuff is so special that is always goes seperate.

It's seems foolish for David to manage the infrastructure and core DRM
changes, as well as those for radeon and the other drivers other than
Intel, which could potentially cause merge issues and conflicts with
your driver changes.

Why not do Intel DRM driver development via his tree?  I just don't
get it. :-/

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/