[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090420084747.GA7286@alberich.amd.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 10:47:47 +0200
From: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@....com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pci: derive nearby CPUs from device's instead of bus'
NUMA information
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 12:26:54PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 9:21 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> > const struct cpumask * cpumask_of_pcidev(struct pci_dev *dev)
> > {
> > if (dev->numa_node == -1)
> > return cpumask_of_pcibus(to_pci_dev(dev)->bus);
> >
> > return cpumask_of_node(dev_to_node(dev));
> > }
> >
> > ? This would work fine in all cases.
Yes, I think so. That's the general solution w/o additional
"ifdefing".
> you are right, dev_to_node(dev) could return -1 on 64bit, if there is
> no memory on that node.
Hmm, I thought just in the CONFIG_NUMA=n case -1 is returned.
During initialization the struct device's numa_node is set to -1 and
later on the information is inherited from the parent numa_node.
So what do I miss?
Thanks,
Andreas
--
Operating | Advanced Micro Devices GmbH
System | Karl-Hammerschmidt-Str. 34, 85609 Dornach b. München, Germany
Research | Geschäftsführer: Jochen Polster, Thomas M. McCoy, Giuliano Meroni
Center | Sitz: Dornach, Gemeinde Aschheim, Landkreis München
(OSRC) | Registergericht München, HRB Nr. 43632
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists