[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49EC5B2A.9080403@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 13:23:22 +0200
From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
CC: Anthony Liguori <anthony@...emonkey.ws>,
Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add MCE support to KVM
On 04/20/09 11:05, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>> On 04/20/09 10:26, Avi Kivity wrote:
>>> Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>>>> The xen pv-on-hvm drivers use an msr to indicate "please place the
>>>> hypercall page here". Handling that in kernel isn't an option IMHO.
>>>
>>> The contents of the hypercall page are vendor specific. This can be
>>> handled from userspace (though ideally we'd abstract the cpu vendor
>>> away).
>>
>> Well, xenner doesn't do vmcalls, so the page isn't vendor specific.
>
> Well, for true pv (not pv-on-hvm) it wouldn't use the MSR, would it?
Yes, the MSR is used for pv-on-hvm only.
>> It looks different for 32bit / 64bit guests though. And it actually
>> can be multiple pages (with one msr write per page). So the interface
>> for in-kernel handling would be more complex than "here is a hypercall
>> page for you".
>
> To different MSRs, or multiple writes to the same MSR?
Same MSR, multiple writes (page number in the low bits).
cheers,
Gerd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists