[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090420131049.GA11839@sgi.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 08:10:49 -0500
From: Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: mingo@...e.hu, tglx@...utronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] - Memoryless nodes
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 11:00:46AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Jack Steiner <steiner@....com> writes:
>
> > Add support for nodes that have cpus but no memory.
> > The current code was failing to add these nodes
> > to the nodes_present_map.
>
> That was intentional because a node is defined as an area of memory
> and an area of memory without memory didn't seem to make sense.
> I still don't think it does. Instead the CPUs are assigned
> to nearby nodes. Back then the generic code also couldn't deal
> with them at all, so you might well run into more problems.
Nodes can also be viewed as a collection of cpus and memory that are
located "close together" - ie., same PXM in the SRAT. Normally nodes will
have both memory & cpus but in theory either cpus or memory could be
missing.
I have run a number of tests of nodes with cpus only and so far have not
seen any issues. I certainly won't rule out problems but have not seen
them yet.
If there are any corner cases that you are aware of, let me know & I can
do some more targeted testing.
(Note: this is not a bizarre end case that I'm trying to fix. UV actually
has blades with cpus and no memory available to the OS.)
--- jack
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists