| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20090420103612.4B4E.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 10:38:10 +0900 (JST) From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com> To: "Zhaolei" <zhaolei@...fujitsu.com> Cc: kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>, "Frederic Weisbecker" <fweisbec@...il.com>, "Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@...dmis.org>, "Tom Zanussi" <tzanussi@...il.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "Oleg Nesterov" <oleg@...hat.com>, "Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] ftrace, workqueuetrace: Make workqueuetracepoints use TRACE_EVENT macro > Thanks for your suggest. > I read distinction between workqueue and worklet. > In my schedule, this patch is first step of our target, my image of steps is: > 1: Move current workqueuetracepoints into TRACEEVENT (this patch) > 2: Make workqueuetrace support per-worklet output (doing) > 3: Add time information to workqueuetrace's worklet stat (need above new TRACEPOINT) > > So, i prepared to add new worklet tracepoints in step3. > What's your opinion? Zhao-san, Maintainer's easy reviewability is very important. Can you switch 2 and 3 ? it cause Ingo can review the patch fill his request or not directly. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists