[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49ECBD31.9010607@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 11:21:37 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <h.peter.anvin@...el.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: Brian Maly <bmaly@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"dannf@...com" <dannf@...com>, "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtc: add x86 support for rtc-efi
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Brian Maly <bmaly@...hat.com> wrote:
>
>>> Hm, it would be nice to first unify the relevant bits of
>>> arch/x86/kernel/time_{32|64}.c into arch/x86/kernel/time.c, and
>>> then we can apply such patches without duplicative effects.
>> Ingo,
>>
>> Are you OK with consolidating this into arch/x86/kernel/rtc.c as
>> Huang Ying had suggested? This seems like the most logical place
>> for the rtc-efi init to happen, but your suggestion to consolidate
>> this into arch/x86/kernel.time.c may have advantages that I am not
>> aware of. Anyway, I would appreciate any insight/opinions on this
>> if you have any. Thanks.
>
> Yes, that indeed sounds like an even better place for it.
>
Furthermore, the EFI RTC code probably should be in its own file.
In fact, arch/x86/kernel really could use more subdirectories; at least
the EFI and UV-specific code should be be moved out.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists