[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0904201520590.26147@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 15:23:58 -0400 (EDT)
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
mingo@...dmis.org, Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Stupid tracepoint ideas
On Mon, 20 Apr 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> does this boot fine? If yes then it would be nice to have a
> measurement.
Currently, it locks up in the kmem part of the event tracer self test. But
I'm not sure if it is due to this or if I uncovered another bug. It
consistantly locks up in the same place too. But looking at the objdump, I
don't see anything wrong.
/me still investigating.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists