[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090420104734.4B51.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 10:49:09 +0900 (JST)
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: "Zhaolei" <zhaolei@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"Frederic Weisbecker" <fweisbec@...il.com>,
"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
"Tom Zanussi" <tzanussi@...il.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Oleg Nesterov" <oleg@...hat.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] ftrace, workqueuetrace: Make workqueuetracepoints use TRACE_EVENT macro
> * From: "KOSAKI Motohiro" <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
> >> Thanks for your suggest.
> >> I read distinction between workqueue and worklet.
> >> In my schedule, this patch is first step of our target, my image of steps is:
> >> 1: Move current workqueuetracepoints into TRACEEVENT (this patch)
> >> 2: Make workqueuetrace support per-worklet output (doing)
> >> 3: Add time information to workqueuetrace's worklet stat (need above new TRACEPOINT)
> >>
> >> So, i prepared to add new worklet tracepoints in step3.
> >> What's your opinion?
> >
>
> Hello, Kosaki-san
>
> > Zhao-san, Maintainer's easy reviewability is very important.
> I agree it.
>
> > Can you switch 2 and 3 ?
> Sorry for my poor English.
> I means 2 is to add worklet stat, 3 is to add more information to worklet stat,
> 3 is based on 2, switch 2 and 3 means merge 2 and 3.
OK.
thus, I recoomend to pending 2 and 3. and change 1 as Ingo suggested.
if not, reviewer might forgot this thread.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists