[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090420180931.7bd7ff02@dhcp-100-2-144.bos.redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 18:09:31 -0400
From: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@...akpoint.cc>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mail@...iasvolk.de
Subject: Re: enable padlock on x86_64
On Sat, 14 Mar 2009 21:24:20 +0800
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 12:53:07PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> >
> > Yep, it is fine.
> > #1 in, #2 not will not result in any difference to what we have now.
> > #2 in, #1 not will result in "padlock not detected" while loading the
> > module and -ENODEV.
>
> Let's merge #1 right now and I'll pick up #2 once #1 shows up
> in linux-net.
>
#1 is in 2.6.30-rc now but I don't see #2 pending anywhere.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists