[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0904201855140.10097@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 18:57:24 -0400 (EDT)
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] tracing: use nowakeup version of commit for function
event trace tests
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 06:22:59PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > From: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>
> >
> > The startup tests for the event tracer also runs with the function
> > tracer enabled. The "wakeup" version of the trace commit was used
> > which can grab spinlocks. If a task was preempted by an NMI
> > that called a function being traced, it could deadlock due to the
> > function tracer trying to grab the same lock.
> >
> > Thanks to Frederic Weisbecker for pointing out where the bug was.
> >
> > Reported-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> > Reported-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> > ---
>
>
> Aah, I was about to push my version, which was the same but with
> a more weird changelog :-)
>
I was going to let you post it, but since I was the one to write the bug,
and it was a one-liner, and I was hitting it myself, I decided to push it.
Otherwise I might have seen your patch's signature section:
fixed-code-f*cked-up-by: Steven Rostedt
/me was reading the conversation on IRC ;-)
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists