[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0904201637280.2199@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 16:40:58 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Tim Abbott <tabbott@....EDU>
cc: Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Anders Kaseorg <andersk@....EDU>,
Waseem Daher <wdaher@....EDU>,
Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Jeff Arnold <jbarnold@....EDU>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jon Masters <jonathan@...masters.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Add support for compiling with -ffunction-sections
-fdata-sections
On Mon, 20 Apr 2009, Tim Abbott wrote:
>
> Is there a problem that is preventing this -ffunction-sections patch
> series from being merged?
Quite frankly, every time I see something like this, I shudder.
Why?
The bugs in the toolchains tend to be infinite and _really_ annoying.
We'll end up with everything from "gcc-xyz cannot handle it" to
"binutils-abc which was pre-released by RH/Ubuntu/SUSE will SIGSEGV".
And those are the _good_ cases. The bad cases are just silently
miscompiled/linked stuff under certain circumstances.
In other words, I'm not going to merge it without a _lot_ of people
pushing me on it with nice numbers etc. Because I absolutely hate the
tools issues that I'm convinced will happen the moment I merge it.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists