linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 07/25] Check in advance if the zonelist needs additional filtering

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1240298472.771.29.camel@penberg-laptop>
Date:	Tue, 21 Apr 2009 10:21:12 +0300
From:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To:	Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
Cc:	Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>,
	Zhang Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/25] Check in advance if the zonelist needs
 additional filtering

Hi Mel,

On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 23:19 +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> Zonelist are filtered based on nodemasks for memory policies normally.
> It can be additionally filters on cpusets if they exist as well as
> noting when zones are full. These simple checks are expensive enough to
> be noticed in profiles. This patch checks in advance if zonelist
> filtering will ever be needed. If not, then the bulk of the checks are
> skipped.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
> @@ -1401,6 +1405,7 @@ get_page_from_freelist(gfp_t gfp_mask, nodemask_t *nodemask, unsigned int order,
>  	nodemask_t *allowednodes = NULL;/* zonelist_cache approximation */
>  	int zlc_active = 0;		/* set if using zonelist_cache */
>  	int did_zlc_setup = 0;		/* just call zlc_setup() one time */
> +	int zonelist_filter = 0;
>  
>  	(void)first_zones_zonelist(zonelist, high_zoneidx, nodemask,
>  							&preferred_zone);
> @@ -1411,6 +1416,10 @@ get_page_from_freelist(gfp_t gfp_mask, nodemask_t *nodemask, unsigned int order,
>  
>  	VM_BUG_ON(order >= MAX_ORDER);
>  
> +	/* Determine in advance if the zonelist needs filtering */
> +	if ((alloc_flags & ALLOC_CPUSET) && unlikely(number_of_cpusets > 1))
> +		zonelist_filter = 1;
> +
>  zonelist_scan:
>  	/*
>  	 * Scan zonelist, looking for a zone with enough free.
> @@ -1418,12 +1427,16 @@ zonelist_scan:
>  	 */
>  	for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, zonelist,
>  						high_zoneidx, nodemask) {
> -		if (NUMA_BUILD && zlc_active &&
> -			!zlc_zone_worth_trying(zonelist, z, allowednodes))
> -				continue;
> -		if ((alloc_flags & ALLOC_CPUSET) &&
> -			!cpuset_zone_allowed_softwall(zone, gfp_mask))
> -				goto try_next_zone;
> +
> +		/* Ignore the additional zonelist filter checks if possible */
> +		if (zonelist_filter) {
> +			if (NUMA_BUILD && zlc_active &&
> +				!zlc_zone_worth_trying(zonelist, z, allowednodes))
> +					continue;
> +			if ((alloc_flags & ALLOC_CPUSET) &&

The above expression is always true here because of the earlier
zonelists_filter check, no?

> +				!cpuset_zone_allowed_softwall(zone, gfp_mask))
> +					goto try_next_zone;
> +		}
>  
>  		if (!(alloc_flags & ALLOC_NO_WATERMARKS)) {
>  			unsigned long mark;


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/