[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090421072524.GX4593@kernel.dk>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 09:25:24 +0200
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] block: enable by default support for large
devices and files on 32-bit archs
On Mon, Apr 20 2009, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> On Saturday 28 March 2009 19:16:06 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> >
> > Enable by default support for large devices and files (CONFIG_LBD):
> >
> > - With 1TB disks being a commodity hardware it is quite easy to hit 2TB
> > limitation while building RAIDs etc. and many distros have been using
> > CONFIG_LBD=y by default already (at least Fedora 10 and openSUSE 11.1).
> >
> > - This should also prevent a subtle ext4 filesystem compatibility issue:
> > mke2fs.ext4 defaults to creating filesystems with huge_files feature
> > enabled and such filesystems cannot be later mounted read-write on
> > machines with CONFIG_LBD=n (it should be quite easy to hit this issue
> > when trying to use filesystem created using distro kernel on system
> > running the self-build kernel, think about USB disk enclosures & co.).
> >
> > While at it:
> >
> > - Clarify config option help text w.r.t. mounting ext4 filesystems
> > (they can be mounted with CONFIG_LBD=n but in the read-only mode).
> >
> > Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
> > Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
> > ---
> > Unfortunately to also update the existings [def]configs the config option
> > rename would be needed. Actually, since the performance impact and kernel
> > size increase seem to be minimal (at least on x86-32) maybe we should just
> > go ahead and remove CONFIG_LBD (== always use 64-bit sector_t/blkcnt_t)?
> >
> > I can make needed changes once there is agreement on preferred approach...
>
> Jens, any thoughts on this?
>
> [ Please note that the patch below should be safe for 2.6.30. ]
I'm fine with it, and since nobody has objected since it was posted,
lets just do it. I have added it.
>
> > block/Kconfig | 11 +++++++----
> > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > Index: b/block/Kconfig
> > ===================================================================
> > --- a/block/Kconfig
> > +++ b/block/Kconfig
> > @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ if BLOCK
> > config LBD
> > bool "Support for large block devices and files"
> > depends on !64BIT
> > + default y
> > help
> > Enable block devices or files of size 2TB and larger.
> >
> > @@ -38,11 +39,13 @@ config LBD
> >
> > The ext4 filesystem requires that this feature be enabled in
> > order to support filesystems that have the huge_file feature
> > - enabled. Otherwise, it will refuse to mount any filesystems
> > - that use the huge_file feature, which is enabled by default
> > - by mke2fs.ext4. The GFS2 filesystem also requires this feature.
> > + enabled. Otherwise, it will refuse to mount in the read-write
> > + mode any filesystems that use the huge_file feature, which is
> > + enabled by default by mke2fs.ext4.
> >
> > - If unsure, say N.
> > + The GFS2 filesystem also requires this feature.
> > +
> > + If unsure, say Y.
> >
> > config BLK_DEV_IO_TRACE
> > bool "Support for tracing block io actions"
> >
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists