[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090421.014923.169153421.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 01:49:23 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: laijs@...fujitsu.com
Cc: zbr@...emap.net, shemminger@...tta.com, dada1@...mosbay.com,
paulus@...ba.org, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, kaber@...sh.net,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, jeff.chua.linux@...il.com,
mingo@...e.hu, jengelh@...ozas.de, r000n@...0n.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfilter: use per-cpu recursive lock (v11)
From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 16:42:40 +0800
> softirq is always not nesting. Why we need recursive lock?
Netfilter itself, is nesting.
When using bridging netfilter, iptables can be entered twice
in the same call chain.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists