[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090421090102.GI12713@csn.ul.ie>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 10:01:02 +0100
From: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Cc: Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>,
Zhang Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 25/25] Use a pre-calculated value instead of
num_online_nodes() in fast paths
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 11:08:20AM +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 23:20 +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > diff --git a/mm/slab.c b/mm/slab.c
> > index 1c680e8..41d1343 100644
> > --- a/mm/slab.c
> > +++ b/mm/slab.c
> > @@ -3579,7 +3579,7 @@ static inline void __cache_free(struct kmem_cache *cachep, void *objp)
> > * variable to skip the call, which is mostly likely to be present in
> > * the cache.
> > */
> > - if (numa_platform && cache_free_alien(cachep, objp))
> > + if (numa_platform > 1 && cache_free_alien(cachep, objp))
> > return;
>
> This doesn't look right. I assume you meant "nr_online_nodes > 1" here?
> If so, please go ahead and remove "numa_platform" completely.
>
It would need to be nr_possible_nodes which would be a separate patch to add
the definition and then drop numa_platform. This change is wrong as part of
this patch. I'll drop it. Thanks
--
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick IBM Dublin Software Lab
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists