[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090421093830.GA3639@cmpxchg.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 11:38:30 +0200
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 3/3][rfc] vmscan: batched swap slot allocation
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 06:27:08PM +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> > > > - cond_resched();
> > > > + if (list_empty(&swap_pages))
> > > > + cond_resched();
> > > >
> > > Why this ?
> >
> > It shouldn't schedule anymore when it's allocated the first swap slot.
> > Another reclaimer could e.g. sleep on the cond_resched() before the
> > loop and when we schedule while having swap slots allocated, we might
> > continue further allocations multiple slots ahead.
>
> Oops, It seems regression. this cond_resched() intent to
>
> cond_resched();
> pageout();
> cond_resched();
> pageout();
> cond_resched();
> pageout();
It still does that. While it collects swap pages (swap_pages list is
non-empty), it doesn't page out. And if it restarts for unmap and
page-out, the swap_pages list is empty and cond_resched() is called.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists