linux-kernel - Re: lockdep report at resume

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 21 Apr 2009 15:59:41 +0200
From:	Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>
To:	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
Cc:	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
	"linux-input" <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: lockdep report at resume

Am Dienstag 21 April 2009 15:51:16 schrieb Jiri Kosina:
> [ thanks for the analysis Johannes ... involving also Oliver here; really
>   seems like a false positive to me ]

I think he's right. But as a matter of principle I'd like to see 
flush_scheduled_work() avoided where possible, hence the patch.

	Regards
		Oliver

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/