[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090421140228.GC3303@hack>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 22:02:28 +0800
From: Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: Tim Abbott <tabbott@....EDU>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Anders Kaseorg <andersk@....edu>,
Waseem Daher <wdaher@....edu>,
Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Jeff Arnold <jbarnold@....edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Add support for compiling with
-ffunction-sections -fdata-sections
On Sun, Apr 05, 2009 at 07:14:34PM -0400, Tim Abbott wrote:
>Hi Linus,
>
>Here is a new version of the -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections patch
>series based on your current master. Please apply.
>
>When I sent a version of this patch series at the start of the merge
>window, Stephen Rothwell pointed out that the first patch conflicted
>with several changes in linux-next, and it should be resent near the
>end of the merge window once those changes were merged. There are
>now no conflicting changes staged in linux-next[0], so now is probably
>the optimal time to merge this patch series.
>
>[0] There is one trivial merge conflict with next-20090403 because
>e5083a63b6a8546c5fe1e571fe529e3939787ec2 was merged into master since
>then, but this will presumably disappear when next catches up tomorrow.
>
> -Tim Abbott
>
>--
>
>The purpose of this patch series is to make it possible to build the
>kernel with "gcc -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections". There are two
>major applications for this functionality: decreasing vmlinux image
>size with --gc-sections, and Ksplice.
Hello, Tim!
Nice work! But, don't -ffunction-sections and -fdata-sections have
collisions with '-g' and 'gprof'? Just like what gcc(1) describes.
CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO relies on '-g', and IIRIC, another project of
linux kernel is trying to 'gprof' the kernel too.
So, CONFIG_FUNCTION_DATA_SECTIONS probably needs to depend on
!CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO etc.
Am I missing something?
Thanks.
--
Live like a child, think like the god.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists