[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0904211107250.19969@qirst.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 11:08:46 -0400 (EDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>,
Zhang Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 24/25] Re-sort GFP flags and fix whitespace alignment
for easier reading.
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009, Mel Gorman wrote:
> Hmm, doh. This resorted when another patch existed that no longer exists
> due to difficulties. This patch only fixes whitespace now but I didn't fix
> the changelog. I can either move it to the next set altogether where it
> does resort things or drop it on the grounds whitespace patches just muck
> with changelogs. I'm leaning towards the latter.
Where were we with that other patch? I vaguely recalling reworking the
other patch (gfp_zone I believe) to be calculated at compile time. Did I
drop this?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists