linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 25/25] Use a pre-calculated value instead of num_online

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0904211109450.19969@qirst.com>
Date:	Tue, 21 Apr 2009 11:09:59 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To:	Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
cc:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
	Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>,
	Zhang Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 25/25] Use a pre-calculated value instead of num_online_nodes()
 in fast paths

On Tue, 21 Apr 2009, Mel Gorman wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 11:08:20AM +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 23:20 +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > > diff --git a/mm/slab.c b/mm/slab.c
> > > index 1c680e8..41d1343 100644
> > > --- a/mm/slab.c
> > > +++ b/mm/slab.c
> > > @@ -3579,7 +3579,7 @@ static inline void __cache_free(struct kmem_cache *cachep, void *objp)
> > >  	 * variable to skip the call, which is mostly likely to be present in
> > >  	 * the cache.
> > >  	 */
> > > -	if (numa_platform && cache_free_alien(cachep, objp))
> > > +	if (numa_platform > 1 && cache_free_alien(cachep, objp))
> > >  		return;
> >
> > This doesn't look right. I assume you meant "nr_online_nodes > 1" here?
> > If so, please go ahead and remove "numa_platform" completely.
> >
>
> It would need to be nr_possible_nodes which would be a separate patch to add
> the definition and then drop numa_platform. This change is wrong as part of
> this patch. I'll drop it. Thanks

nr_online_nodes would be okay as Pekka suggested.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/