[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090421163758.GF6642@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 09:37:58 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, kaber@...sh.net,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, jeff.chua.linux@...il.com,
mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com, jengelh@...ozas.de,
r000n@...0n.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfilter: use per-cpu recursive lock (v11)
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 06:59:29AM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
[ . . . ]
> Hopefully, next rcu_bh (or whatever name is used) will permit us
> to switch back to pure RCU in 2.6.31
My excursion in to rcu_fgp can be thought of as a training exercise for
doing this, though perhaps others are also working on an upgraded rcu_bh
as well.
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists