[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49EE0013.6010008@zytor.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 10:19:15 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>
CC: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@...il.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...shcourse.ca>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: arch/x86/Kconfig selects invalid HAVE_READQ, HAVE_WRITEQ vars
Roland Dreier wrote:
>
> However I worry that this just leaves driver authors too much rope.
> Choosing readq_atomic() vs. readq() is just one more thing to get wrong.
>
... as is having each driver implementing their own substitutes.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists