| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <49ED27EE.8080600@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 09:57:02 +0800
From: Zhaolei <zhaolei@...fujitsu.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
CC: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@...il.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH 4/4] trace_workqueue: Add worklet information
Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
...
>> /* Destruction of a cpu workqueue thread */
>> @@ -115,12 +197,22 @@ static void probe_workqueue_destruction(struct task_struct *wq_thread)
>>
>> spin_lock_irqsave(&workqueue_cpu_stat(cpu)->lock, flags);
>> list_for_each_entry_safe(node, next, &workqueue_cpu_stat(cpu)->list,
>> - list) {
>> - if (node->pid == wq_thread->pid) {
>> - list_del(&node->list);
>> - kfree(node);
>> - goto found;
>> + list) {
>> + struct workfunc_stats *wfstat, *wfstatnext;
>> +
>> + if (node->pid != wq_thread->pid)
>> + continue;
>> +
>> + list_for_each_entry_safe(wfstat, wfstatnext,
>> + &node->workfunclist, list) {
>> + list_del(&wfstat->list);
>> + kfree(wfstat);
>> }
>> +
>> + list_del(&node->list);
>> + kfree(node);
>
>
>
> Sidenote to me: I have to provide a way for a stat
> tracer to wait for the end of a pending statistic
> output session before the tracer comes to free any
> of its exposed entries. Otherwise we could end up
> with freed memory dereference.
>
> May be waitqueue.
>
>
>
>> +
>> + goto found;
>> }
>>
>> pr_debug("trace_workqueue: don't find workqueue to destroy\n");
>> @@ -129,17 +221,23 @@ found:
>>
>> }
>>
>> -static struct cpu_workqueue_stats *workqueue_stat_start_cpu(int cpu)
>> +static struct workfunc_stats *workqueue_stat_start_cpu(int cpu)
>> {
>> unsigned long flags;
>> - struct cpu_workqueue_stats *ret = NULL;
>> -
>> + struct workfunc_stats *ret = NULL;
>>
>> spin_lock_irqsave(&workqueue_cpu_stat(cpu)->lock, flags);
>>
>> - if (!list_empty(&workqueue_cpu_stat(cpu)->list))
>> - ret = list_entry(workqueue_cpu_stat(cpu)->list.next,
>> - struct cpu_workqueue_stats, list);
>> + if (!list_empty(&workqueue_cpu_stat(cpu)->list)) {
>> + struct cpu_workqueue_stats *cws;
>> + cws = list_entry(workqueue_cpu_stat(cpu)->list.next,
>> + struct cpu_workqueue_stats, list);
>> + /*
>> + * cpu_workqueue_stats->workfunclist at least have a dummy node
>> + */
>> + ret = list_entry(cws->workfunclist.next, struct workfunc_stats,
>> + list);
>> + }
>>
>> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&workqueue_cpu_stat(cpu)->lock, flags);
>>
>> @@ -161,43 +259,75 @@ static void *workqueue_stat_start(struct tracer_stat *trace)
>>
>> static void *workqueue_stat_next(void *prev, int idx)
>> {
>> - struct cpu_workqueue_stats *prev_cws = prev;
>> - int cpu = prev_cws->cpu;
>> + struct workfunc_stats *prev_wfstat = prev;
>> + int cpu = prev_wfstat->parent->cpu;
>> unsigned long flags;
>> void *ret = NULL;
>>
>> spin_lock_irqsave(&workqueue_cpu_stat(cpu)->lock, flags);
>> - if (list_is_last(&prev_cws->list, &workqueue_cpu_stat(cpu)->list)) {
>> +
>> + if (!list_is_last(&prev_wfstat->list,
>> + &prev_wfstat->parent->workfunclist)) {
>> + ret = list_entry(prev_wfstat->list.next, struct workfunc_stats,
>> + list);
>> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&workqueue_cpu_stat(cpu)->lock, flags);
>> - do {
>> - cpu = cpumask_next(cpu, cpu_possible_mask);
>> - if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
>> - return NULL;
>> - } while (!(ret = workqueue_stat_start_cpu(cpu)));
>> return ret;
>> }
>> +
>> + if (!list_is_last(&prev_wfstat->parent->list,
>> + &workqueue_cpu_stat(cpu)->list)) {
>> + struct cpu_workqueue_stats *cws = list_entry(
>> + prev_wfstat->parent->list.next,
>> + struct cpu_workqueue_stats, list);
>> + ret = list_entry(cws->workfunclist.next, struct workfunc_stats,
>> + list);
>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&workqueue_cpu_stat(cpu)->lock, flags);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&workqueue_cpu_stat(cpu)->lock, flags);
>>
>> - return list_entry(prev_cws->list.next, struct cpu_workqueue_stats,
>> - list);
>> + do {
>> + cpu = cpumask_next(cpu, cpu_possible_mask);
>> + if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
>
Hello, Frederic
Thanks for your review and advice.
>
> The above test will take the total number of cpus as
> the last cpu number. This assumption may be false
> if the possible cpus are not contiguous.
>
> Perhaps you'd better use:
>
>
> for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> ret = workqueue_stat_start_cpu(cpu);
> if (ret)
> break;
> }
IMHO, this code is to choose first cpu who have workqueue.
But we need to choose next cpu, may be we need to:
int nextcpu;
for_each_possible_cpu(nextcpu) {
/* bypass prev cpus */
if (nextcpu <= cpu)
continue;
ret = workqueue_stat_start_cpu(cpu);
if (ret) {
break;
}
}
By looking cpumask.h, for_each_possible_cpu(nextcpu) always make nextcpu
increase, but if not(in future?), above code is wrong.
Thanks
Zhaolei
>
> After a quick look in cpumask.h it seems it will start
> from the cpu which follows the one you give in parameter.
> So it should be fine.
>
>
>
>> + return NULL;
>> + } while (!(ret = workqueue_stat_start_cpu(cpu)));
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> }
>>
>> static int workqueue_stat_show(struct seq_file *s, void *p)
>> {
>> - struct cpu_workqueue_stats *cws = p;
>> + struct workfunc_stats *wfstat = p;
>> + struct cpu_workqueue_stats *cws = wfstat->parent;
>> struct pid *pid;
>> struct task_struct *tsk;
>>
>> - pid = find_get_pid(cws->pid);
>> - if (pid) {
>> - tsk = get_pid_task(pid, PIDTYPE_PID);
>> - if (tsk) {
>> - seq_printf(s, "%3d %6d %6u %s\n", cws->cpu,
>> - atomic_read(&cws->inserted), cws->executed,
>> - tsk->comm);
>> - put_task_struct(tsk);
>> + if (!wfstat->func) {
>> + /* It is first dummy node, need to print workqueue info */
>> + pid = find_get_pid(cws->pid);
>> + if (pid) {
>> + tsk = get_pid_task(pid, PIDTYPE_PID);
>> + if (tsk) {
>> + seq_printf(s, "%3d %6d %6u %s:%d\n",
>> + cws->cpu,
>> + atomic_read(&cws->inserted),
>> + cws->executed,
>> + tsk->comm,
>> + cws->pid);
>> + put_task_struct(tsk);
>> + }
>> + put_pid(pid);
>> }
>> - put_pid(pid);
>> + } else {
>> + /* It is effect node, need to print workfunc info */
>> + int lastwf = list_is_last(&wfstat->list, &cws->workfunclist);
>> + seq_printf(s, "%3d %6d %6u %c-%pF\n",
>> + cws->cpu,
>> + atomic_read(&wfstat->inserted),
>> + wfstat->executed,
>> + lastwf ? '`' : '|',
>> + wfstat->func);
>> }
>>
>> return 0;
>> @@ -205,7 +335,8 @@ static int workqueue_stat_show(struct seq_file *s, void *p)
>>
>> static int workqueue_stat_headers(struct seq_file *s)
>> {
>> - seq_printf(s, "# CPU INSERTED EXECUTED NAME\n");
>> + seq_printf(s, "# CPU INSERTED EXECUTED TASKNAME:PID\n");
>> + seq_printf(s, "# | | | `-WORKFUNC\n");
>> seq_printf(s, "# | | | |\n");
>> return 0;
>> }
>> --
>
>
>
> Looks very nice, like the rest of the series.
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists