linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] ksm - dynamic page sharing driver for linux v3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200904211259.59752.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Date:	Tue, 21 Apr 2009 12:59:58 +1000
From:	Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
To:	Jared Hulbert <jaredeh@...il.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Izik Eidus <ieidus@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, avi@...hat.com,
	aarcange@...hat.com, chrisw@...hat.com, mtosatti@...hat.com,
	hugh@...itas.com, kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] ksm - dynamic page sharing driver for linux v3

On Friday 17 April 2009 17:08:07 Jared Hulbert wrote:
> > As everyone knows, my favourite thing is to say nasty things about any
> > new feature that adds complexity to common code. I feel like crying to
> > hear about how many more instances of MS Office we can all run, if only
> > we apply this patch. And the poorly written HPC app just sounds like
> > scrapings from the bottom of justification barrel.
> >
> > I'm sorry, maybe I'm way off with my understanding of how important
> > this is. There isn't too much help in the changelog. A discussion of
> > where the memory savings comes from, and how far does things like
> > sharing of fs image, or ballooning goes and how much extra savings we
> > get from this... with people from other hypervisors involved as well.
> > Have I missed this kind of discussion?
> 
> Nick,
> 
> I don't know about other hypervisors, fs and balloonings, but I have
> tried this out.  It works.  It works on apps I don't consider, "poorly
> written".  I'm very excited about this.  I got >10% saving in a
> roughly off the shelf embedded system.  No user noticeable performance
> impact.

OK well that's what I want to hear. Thanks, that means a lot to me.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/