linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH] fix sign extension with 1.5TB usb-storage LBD=y

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090421213139.GB1926@parisc-linux.org>
Date:	Tue, 21 Apr 2009 15:31:39 -0600
From:	Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
To:	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
Cc:	Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	mdharm-usb@...-eyed-alien.net,
	linux-usb <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
	usb-storage@...ts.one-eyed-alien.net,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
	linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] fix sign extension with 1.5TB usb-storage LBD=y

On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 02:29:54PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > Fix READ CAPACITY 10 with drives over 1TB
> > 
> > Shifting an unsigned char implicitly casts it to a signed int.  This
> > caused 'lba' to sign-extend and Linux would then try READ CAPACITY 16
> > which was not supported by at least one drive.  Making 'lba' an unsigned
> > int ensures that sign extension will not occur.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...ux.intel.com>
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sd.c b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> > index 3fcb64b..c856b1b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> > @@ -1373,7 +1373,7 @@ static int read_capacity_10(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, struct scsi_device *sdp,
> >  	int sense_valid = 0;
> >  	int the_result;
> >  	int retries = 3;
> > -	sector_t lba;
> > +	unsigned lba;
> 
> sector_t is either unsigned long or u64, depending on CONFIG_LBD.
> Are you saying (implying) that the higher-order bits of it don't matter here?
> If so, I'd just like for that to be clear(er).

We're reading 32 bits of information from the drive response.  The top
32 bits are implicitly zero.

-- 
Matthew Wilcox				Intel Open Source Technology Centre
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours.  We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/