[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49ED5DA8.4080206@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 13:46:16 +0800
From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
CC: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>,
Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, kaber@...sh.net,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, jeff.chua.linux@...il.com,
mingo@...e.hu, jengelh@...ozas.de, r000n@...0n.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfilter: use per-cpu recursive lock (v11)
My silly opinion about lockdep in this patch:
> +
> +struct xt_info_lock {
> + spinlock_t lock;
+ struct lock_class_key key;
> + int depth; /* # readers - 1 */
> +};
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct xt_info_lock, xt_info_locks);
> +
> +
> +static inline void xt_info_lock_init(struct xt_info_lock *lock)
> +{
> + spin_lock_init(&lock->lock);
+ lockdep_set_class(&lock->lock, &lock->key);
> + lock->depth = -1;
> +}
> +
And remove lockdep_xxx()s.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists