[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49EED645.3090208@suse.de>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 14:03:09 +0530
From: Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@...e.de>
To: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>
CC: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Masahiro Tamori <masahiro.tamori@...il.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <compudj@...stal.dyndns.org>,
linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, ltt-dev@...ts.casi.polymtl.ca,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-embedded@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ltt-dev] [PATCH] nfs: add support for splice writes
Trond Myklebust wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-04-21 at 10:48 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 09:17:23PM +0530, Suresh Jayaraman wrote:
>>> +static ssize_t nfs_file_splice_write(struct pipe_inode_info *pipe,
>>> + struct file *filp, loff_t *ppos,
>>> + size_t count, unsigned int flags)
>>> +{
>>> + struct dentry *dentry = filp->f_path.dentry;
>>> +
>>> + dprintk("NFS splice_write(%s/%s, %lu@%Lu)\n",
>>> + dentry->d_parent->d_name.name, dentry->d_name.name,
>>> + (unsigned long) count, (unsigned long long) *ppos);
>>> +
>>> + return generic_file_splice_write(pipe, filp, ppos, count, flags);
>>> +}
>>> +
>> You need all calls from nfs_file_write, too:
>>
>> - most importantly the nfs_revalidate_file_size for O_APPEND
>
> Isn't O_APPEND illegal for splice_write()? It looks like it is from a
> quick perusal of do_splice_from().
Yes, I would also think so and also from upstream commit
efc968d450e013049a662d22727cf132618dcb2f.
I've added a little comment to make his clear.
>> - the nfs_do_fsync for sync writes
>
> generic_file_splice_write() calls generic_osync_inode(), which should
> ensure sync writes even with NFS.
> The one thing it won't do is propagate NFS write errors back to the
> caller. If we do care about this, then we should certainly test for
> nfs_need_sync_write() and then call nfs_do_fsync() (see
> nfs_file_write()).
I think it makes sense to propagate NFS write errors back.
>> - probably the stats increment
>
> We should talk to Chuck about this.
>
Have added it to NORMALBYTESWRITTEN based on Chuck's suggestion.
Here is the updated patch. Does this look OK?
Signed-off-by: Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@...e.de>
---
fs/nfs/file.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfs/file.c b/fs/nfs/file.c
index 5a97bcf..6f2cd67 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/file.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/file.c
@@ -48,6 +48,9 @@ static ssize_t nfs_file_splice_read(struct file *filp, loff_t *ppos,
size_t count, unsigned int flags);
static ssize_t nfs_file_read(struct kiocb *, const struct iovec *iov,
unsigned long nr_segs, loff_t pos);
+static ssize_t nfs_file_splice_write(struct pipe_inode_info *pipe,
+ struct file *filp, loff_t *ppos,
+ size_t count, unsigned int flags);
static ssize_t nfs_file_write(struct kiocb *, const struct iovec *iov,
unsigned long nr_segs, loff_t pos);
static int nfs_file_flush(struct file *, fl_owner_t id);
@@ -73,6 +76,7 @@ const struct file_operations nfs_file_operations = {
.lock = nfs_lock,
.flock = nfs_flock,
.splice_read = nfs_file_splice_read,
+ .splice_write = nfs_file_splice_write,
.check_flags = nfs_check_flags,
.setlease = nfs_setlease,
};
@@ -587,6 +591,34 @@ out_swapfile:
goto out;
}
+static ssize_t nfs_file_splice_write(struct pipe_inode_info *pipe,
+ struct file *filp, loff_t *ppos,
+ size_t count, unsigned int flags)
+{
+ struct dentry *dentry = filp->f_path.dentry;
+ struct inode *inode = dentry->d_inode;
+ ssize_t ret;
+
+ dprintk("NFS splice_write(%s/%s, %lu@...u)\n",
+ dentry->d_parent->d_name.name, dentry->d_name.name,
+ (unsigned long) count, (unsigned long long) *ppos);
+
+ /*
+ * We don't need to worry about O_APPEND as the combination of splice
+ * and an O_APPEND destination is disallowed.
+ */
+
+ nfs_add_stats(inode, NFSIOS_NORMALWRITTENBYTES, count);
+
+ ret = generic_file_splice_write(pipe, filp, ppos, count, flags);
+ if (ret >= 0 && nfs_need_sync_write(filp, inode)) {
+ int err = nfs_do_fsync(nfs_file_open_context(filp), inode);
+ if (err < 0)
+ ret = err;
+ }
+ return ret;
+}
+
static int do_getlk(struct file *filp, int cmd, struct file_lock *fl)
{
struct inode *inode = filp->f_mapping->host;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists