linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86 microcode: work_on_cpu and cleanup of the synchronization logic

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090422101811.GA1115@elte.hu>
Date:	Wed, 22 Apr 2009 12:18:11 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@...il.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@....com>,
	Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@....com>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
	Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86 microcode: work_on_cpu and cleanup of the
	synchronization logic


* Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@...il.com> wrote:

> +static long collect_cpu_info_local(void *arg)
> +{
> +	struct collect_for_cpu *cfc = arg;
> +
> +	BUG_ON(cfc->cpu != raw_smp_processor_id());
> +
> +	return microcode_ops->collect_cpu_info(cfc->cpu, cfc->cpu_sig);
> +}
> +
> +static int collect_cpu_info_on_target(int cpu, struct cpu_signature *cpu_sig)
> +{
> +	struct collect_for_cpu cfc = { .cpu_sig = cpu_sig, .cpu = cpu };
> +
> +	return work_on_cpu(cpu, collect_cpu_info_local, &cfc);
> +}

Couldnt this be done without work_on_cpu(), by using 
smp_call_function()?

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/