[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090422113902.GB6630@ff.dom.local>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 11:39:02 +0000
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, kaber@...sh.net,
jeff.chua.linux@...il.com, laijs@...fujitsu.com,
jengelh@...ozas.de, r000n@...0n.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfilter: use per-cpu recursive lock (v11)
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 01:26:12PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > On 22-04-2009 10:53, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > ...
> > > If this could be done without recursion, I am pretty sure
> > > netfilter and network guys would have done it. I found Linus
> > > reaction quite shocking IMHO, considering hard work done by all
> > > people on this.
> >
> > Right, looks like 100% (Scandinavian?!) troll. I wonder where is
> > the admin of this mess...
>
> You might disagree with me on an honest technical basis, but note
> that this kind of childish, knee-jerk reaction against dissenting
> people is what gives netdev its bad reputation.
How did you find I disagree with you? There was nothing about you,
neither anything technical. Actually, I forgot to mention I agree with
Eric about your locking proposal.
Jarek P.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists