linux-kernel - Re: [RFD] voltage/current regulator consumer interface

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <49EF30F5.7030108@beta.intcomgrp.com>
Date:	Wed, 22 Apr 2009 11:00:05 -0400
From:	James Kosin <jkosin@...a.intcomgrp.com>
To:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
CC:	Mark Brown <broonie@...ena.org.uk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFD] voltage/current regulator consumer interface

Alan Cox wrote:
>>> In power management line normally refers to the core, unregulated power
>>> bus for the system and a line supply would normally be something like a
>>> wall wart that supplies this directly when it's connected.
>> Can I suggest:
>> "supply-switch" or "regulator-switch" may make more sense for the moment.
> 
> Can I suggest they don't. The naming should reflect the naming actually
> used in the field by people working on the technology otherwise arbitary
> renaming just creates confusion
> 
> The supply switch is the big switch on the back
> 
> Alan
> 
Ok, "supply-switch" may have been a bad idea, I wasn't thinking yet.
The coffee hasn't kicked in yet and I'm feeling a bit down.

James


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (259 bytes)