linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/10] MAINTAINERS - add script, patterns and misc updates

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1240415689.21848.19.camel@localhost>
Date:	Wed, 22 Apr 2009 08:54:49 -0700
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/10] MAINTAINERS - add script, patterns and misc
 updates

On Tue, 2009-04-07 at 10:13 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 13:47 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > > I was hoping to get the patch that changed all pairs of
> > > P:
> > > M:
> > > lines to one line that is suitable for pasting into email addresses. 
> > I thought the P/M: integration was an unnecessary
> > complication that would delay pattern acceptance.
> 
> Well, P/M integration would help when using less/emacs to browse
> through maintainers then copy&paste using mouse... but yes, it makes
> sense to have it in separate patch :-).  

Is there agreement the P:/M: consolidation is useful?
No other scripts use the current style but get_maintainer?
If so, I'll submit it this week along with some other
patches.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/