[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49EE8855.1080306@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:00:37 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
CC: Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org>, subrata@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, Linuxppc-dev <Linuxppc-dev@...abs.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
sachinp <sachinp@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@...il.com>,
samr <sam@...nborg.org>
Subject: Re: [BUILD FAILURE 11/12] Next April 21 : PPC64 randconfig [drivers/usb/host/ohci-hcd.o]
David Brownell wrote:
> On Tuesday 21 April 2009, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>> Since its feasible to say 'n' to both we get the compile error. How do
>>> we enforce having at least one set?
>> Looks like using "choice" without "optional" would do it.
>> See Documentation/kbuild/kconfig-language.txt and various examples
>> in Kconfig* files.
>
> That won't quite work ... "at least one" includes "two"
> (i.e. a PCI card in little-endian, a native controller
> in big-endian). Real-world systems need such configs,
> or so I'm told, and that's why their supported.
Yes, I see.
> Is there maybe a way to force Kconfig to just reject
> such illegal configs -- neither option set -- rather
> than trying some how to fix it?
Not that I know of. cc-ing Sam.
> Or maybe ... if neither one is set, have the header
> force both on, and issue a warning.
That should be doable. We'd prefer to catch it via Kconfig,
but that doesn't look promising just now.
--
~Randy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists