linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] crc-itu-t: add bit-reversed calculation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 22 Apr 2009 19:54:46 +0100
From:	Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
Cc:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	Darren Salt <linux@...mustbejoking.demon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] crc-itu-t: add bit-reversed calculation

On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 11:44:09AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 07:32:23PM +0100, Darren Salt wrote:
> > I demand that Greg KH may or may not have written...
> > 
> > > On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 03:33:37AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > >> Signed-off-by: Darren Salt <linux@...mustbejoking.demon.co.uk>
> > 
> > > Who wrote this patch, you or Darren?
> > 
> > I did.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Then Ben should keep that authorship information properly when he
> forwards patches onward.  You can do this by putting:
> 	From: Darren Salt <email_address_here>
> as the first line in the body of the email.  Our tools will properly
> pick it up there and give the correct attribution.
> 
> Ben, does this make sense?
 
Yes, that's what I usually do with other people's patches.  It was an
oversight in this case.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Reality is just a crutch for people who can't handle science fiction.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/