lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9929d2390904221322v1c00b0c8see98efb4354cb173@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 22 Apr 2009 13:22:25 -0700
From:	Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
To:	Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@...oscopio.com>
Cc:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 fixed] e100: do not go D3 in shutdown unless system is 
	powering off

On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:37 PM, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
<cascardo@...oscopio.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 10:46:19PM -0700, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 9:38 PM, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
>> <cascardo@...oscopio.com> wrote:
>> > After experimenting with kexec with the last merges after 2.6.29, I've
>> > had some problems when probing e100. It would not read the eeprom. After
>> > some bisects, I realized this has been like that since forever (at least
>> > 2.6.18). The problem is that shutdown is doing the same thing that
>> > suspend does and puts the device in D3 state. I couldn't find a way to
>> > get the device back to a sane state in the probe function. So, based on
>> > some similar patches from Rafael J. Wysocki for e1000, e1000e and ixgbe,
>> > I wrote this one for e100.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@...oscopio.com>
>> > ---
>>
>> Thanks, I will add it to my queue of patches for e100.
>>
>> Also, just FYI, Auke is no longer a maintainer for
>> e100/e1000/e1000e/igb/ixgb/ixgbe devices, so I have removed him from
>> the thread.
>>
>> --
>> Cheers,
>> Jeff
>
> Perhaps, Rafael should be mentioned in a Reviewed-by? As well as you if
> you did review it? I guess a Tested-by and Reported-by me is overkill,
> right? :-)
>

Correct, that would be overkill.  If Rafael wants his Ack or
Reviewed-by added, he will let us know.

Once we have done some regression testing on the patch, I will add my
signed-off-by before sending it to Dave.

-- 
Cheers,
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ