[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090422232636.GB22718@Krystal>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 19:26:36 -0400
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mark.langsdorf@....com,
arekm@...en.pl, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] x86 amd fix cmpxchg read acquire barrier
* Alan Cox (alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk) wrote:
> > Good point. I should probably configure this as "nothing" unless
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> > #if (defined(CONFIG_GENERIC_CPU) || defined(CONFIG_MK8))
> > ...
> > #endif
> > #endif
>
> Is the erratum only present in 64bit mode ?
>
Hrm, from the info I gathered in the web pages linked in the patch
header (refering to Google and Solaris), nothing said it was limited to
64bit mode. You are right.
> Really this needs someone with knowledge of the erratum to characterise
> it accurately and the workarounds.
Yep, but all I can hear from AMD so far is... *crickets*
The last revision of their errata I can find has been updated in
February 2008, and does not talk about this issue.
http://support.amd.com/us/Processor_TechDocs/25759.pdf
Thanks,
Mathieu
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists