[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7321.1240375306@jrobl>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 13:41:46 +0900
From: hooanon05@...oo.co.jp
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>, bfields@...i.umich.edu,
hch@...radead.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Fix i_mutex handling in nfsd readdir
David Woodhouse:
> This patch fixes it by locking the directory's i_mutex again before
> calling the filldir functions. The original deadlocks which commit
:::
An entry may be removed between the first mutex_unlock and the second
mutex_lock. In this case, lookup_one_len() in compose_entry_fh() will
return a negative dentry.
Currently the inode test (positive/negative) is done AFTER fh_compose().
Isn't it better to test it BEFORE fh_compose()?
compose_entry_fh()
{
:::
dchild = lookup_one_len(name, dparent, namlen);
if (IS_ERR(dchild))
return 1;
if (d_mountpoint(dchild) ||
fh_compose(fhp, exp, dchild, &cd->fh) != 0 ||
!dchild->d_inode)
rv = 1;
:::
}
J. R. Okajima
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists