[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090422132451.62A4.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 13:49:21 +0900 (JST)
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] check for frozen filesystems in the mmap path
> > 2. this logic kill multi thread application.
> >
> > this logic mean mmap_sem grabbing until unfreeze.
> > it mean othrer thread in the same process can't page-fault although
> > it don't touch frozen-sb.
> > it seems strange.
>
> Hm, I hadn't thought about this ... On the one hand, ->page_mkwrite can
> already sleep, though a userspace freeze/unfreeze could potentially take
> much much longer. freeze/unfreeze *should* happen very quickly, but
> nothing enforces that.
>
> Do you have any suggestions?
One more comment.
I read ioctl_fsfreeze() and freeze_bdev(), it call __fsync_super().
Oh, I don't think __fsync_suepr is very quick.
So, page-fault have one unique characteristics.
if page-fault return 0 without pte change, page-fault is occur again soon.
then, if you need long time waiting, I think you can use following technique.
unlock mmap_sem
wait long-time
lock mmap_sem
goto out;
it cause page-fault counter increment twice unintesionally.
but no problem. fs-freeze is not freqently event.
Am I missing anything?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists