[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <796440.13871.qm@web32603.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 23:06:15 -0700 (PDT)
From: Martin Knoblauch <spamtrap@...bisoft.de>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Booting 2.6.30-rc2-git7 very slow
----- Original Message ----
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>
> To: Martin Knoblauch <spamtrap@...bisoft.de>
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 9:12:20 PM
> Subject: Re: Booting 2.6.30-rc2-git7 very slow
>
> On Tuesday 21 April 2009, Martin Knoblauch wrote:
> >
> > Hi, [please CC me on replies, as I am not subscribed]
> >
> > booting 2.6.30-rc2-git7 on a HP/DL380G3 (x86_64, RHEL4.3, 64 bit userspace)
> is much slower that it used to be. It seems I run into timeouts when [trying to]
> load intel and tg3 microcodes:
> >
> > [ 14.478892] platform microcode: firmware: requesting intel-ucode/0f-04-0a
> > [ 74.476741] platform microcode: firmware: requesting intel-ucode/0f-04-0a
> > [ 134.476638] platform microcode: firmware: requesting intel-ucode/0f-04-0a
> > [ 194.476637] platform microcode: firmware: requesting intel-ucode/0f-04-0a
> > [ 254.476493] Microcode Update Driver: v2.00 ,
> Peter Oruba
> > [ 254.718489] Microcode Update Driver: v2.00 removed.
> >
> > So, we see 60 seconds for eaoch of the CPUs
> >
> > [ 255.273426] tg3 0000:03:01.0: PME# disabled
> > [ 257.833769] tg3: eth0: Link is up at 1000 Mbps, full duplex.
> > [ 257.833775] tg3: eth0: Flow control is off for TX and off for RX.
> > [ 269.643973] tg3 0000:03:01.1: firmware: requesting tigon/tg3_tso.bin
> > [ 329.640456] eth1: Failed to load firmware "tigon/tg3_tso.bin"
> > [ 329.640463] eth1: TSO capability disabled.
> > [ 329.640487] tg3 0000:03:01.1: PME# disabled
> > [ 333.081753] tg3: eth1: Link is up at 1000 Mbps, full duplex.
> > [ 333.081759] tg3: eth1: Flow control is off for TX and off for RX.
> >
> > We see 60 seconds for eth1, complaining about a failed firmware load.
> > /lib/firmware/tigon/tg3_tso.bin does exist and is from the current
> > build.
>
> Do I assume correctly that 2.6.29 did not have this problem?
>
I can tell that 2.6.28.2 did not have that problem. I skipped 2.6.29, so I cannot be sure. This is from the 2.6.28.2 boot sequence:
[ 14.148605] platform microcode: firmware: requesting intel-ucode/0f-04-0a
[ 14.194728] platform microcode: firmware: requesting intel-ucode/0f-04-0a
[ 14.226354] platform microcode: firmware: requesting intel-ucode/0f-04-0a
[ 14.258677] platform microcode: firmware: requesting intel-ucode/0f-04-0a
[ 14.291483] Microcode Update Driver: v2.00 <tigran@...azian.fsnet.co.uk>, Peter Oruba
[ 14.530193] Microcode Update Driver: v2.00 removed.
[ 17.629690] tg3: eth0: Link is up at 1000 Mbps, full duplex.
[ 17.629695] tg3: eth0: Flow control is off for TX and off for RX.
[ 33.328198] tg3: eth1: Link is up at 1000 Mbps, full duplex.
[ 33.328203] tg3: eth1: Flow control is off for TX and off for RX.
[ 44.737601] RPC: Registered udp transport module.
[ 44.737606] RPC: Registered tcp transport module.
[ 47.637782] warning: process `snmpd' used the deprecated sysctl system call with 7.2.1.
[ 57.671627] warning: `ntpd' uses 32-bit capabilities (legacy support in use)
Cheers
Martin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists