[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090423092350.F6E6.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 09:27:15 +0900 (JST)
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>,
Zhang Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/22] Use allocation flags as an index to the zone watermark
> On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 18:14 +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > Preference of taste really. When I started a conversion to accessors, it
> > changed something recognised to something new that looked uglier to me.
> > Only one place cares about the union enough to access is via an array so
> > why spread it everywhere.
>
> Personally, I'd say for consistency. Someone looking at both forms
> wouldn't necessarily know that they refer to the same variables unless
> they know about the union.
for just clalification...
AFAIK, C language specification don't gurantee point same value.
compiler can insert pad between struct-member and member, but not insert
into array.
However, all gcc version don't do that. I think. but perhaps I missed
some minor gcc release..
So, I also like Dave's idea. but it only personal feeling.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists