[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <x49hc0f79k9.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 10:01:58 -0400
From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Subject: 2.6.30-rc deadline scheduler performance regression for iozone over NFS
Hi,
I've been working on CFQ improvements for interleaved I/Os between
processes, and noticed a regression in performance when using the
deadline I/O scheduler. The test uses a server configured with a cciss
array and 1Gb/s ethernet.
The iozone command line was:
iozone -s 2000000 -r 64 -f /mnt/test/testfile -i 1 -w
The numbers in the nfsd's row represent the number of nfsd "threads".
These numbers (in MB/s) represent the average of 5 runs.
v2.6.29
nfsd's | 1 | 2 | 4 | 8
--------+---------------+-------+------
deadline| 43207 | 67436 | 96289 | 107590
2.6.30-rc1
nfsd's | 1 | 2 | 4 | 8
--------+---------------+-------+------
deadline| 43732 | 68059 | 76659 | 83231
2.6.30-rc3.block-for-linus
nfsd's | 1 | 2 | 4 | 8
--------+---------------+-------+------
deadline| 46102 | 71151 | 83120 | 82330
Notice the drop for 4 and 8 threads. It may be worth noting that the
default number of NFSD threads is 8.
Cheers,
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists