lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 23 Apr 2009 10:19:38 -0400
From:	Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@...i.com>
To:	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:	Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>, Brice Goglin <brice@...i.com>
Subject: IRQ / SoftIRQ CPU time accounting broken by 457533a7d3402d1d91fbc125c8bd1bd16dcd3cd4

When running netperf for some 10GbE tests, I noticed
that  IRQ and SOFTIRQ CPU time is no longer reported for an
otherwise idle CPU on recent kernels, at least for x86_64.

If I take a 2-CPU system, and bind the NIC IRQ to CPU0, and
bind the user-space netserver daemon to CPU1, the problem
is obvious when blasting 10Gb/s of traffic at it.  I see
no CPU used for irq or softirq on CPU0, even though it is
handling 13K interrupts/sec:



% mpstat -P 0 1
Linux 2.6.30-rc1 (venice)       04/22/09

11:25:25     CPU   %user   %nice %system %iowait    %irq   %soft   %idle 
    intr/s
11:25:26       0    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00  100.00 
  13248.00
11:25:27       0    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00  100.00 
  13280.00

Common sense tells me that is wrong, and oprofile verifies there is
a lot happening on CPU0.  Further, when I run a cpu-soaker in
usermode bound to CPU0, I start to see irq, softirq, etc,
being correctly identified:

11:28:02     CPU   %user   %nice %system %iowait    %irq   %soft   %idle 
    intr/s
11:28:03       0   45.10    0.00    0.00    0.00    1.96   52.94    0.00 
  13019.61
11:28:04       0   46.46    0.00    0.00    0.00    2.02   51.52    0.00 
  13414.14

The problem is observable, but much less obvious when using a more
common, e1000 1GbE NIC (15% softirq is missing, rather than 50%).

I spent a few hours git-bisecting until I finally got here:

% git-bisect bad
Bisecting: 0 revisions left to test after this
[457533a7d3402d1d91fbc125c8bd1bd16dcd3cd4] fix scaled & unscaled cputime 
accounting

I have neither CONFIG_NO_HZ, CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING, or XEN configured.

Drew
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ