[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090423154959.GE8476@shell>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 11:49:59 -0400
From: Valerie Aurora Henson <vaurora@...hat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>,
Ric Wheeler <rwheeler@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] fpathconf() for fsync() behavior
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 07:11:47AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 08:12:57PM -0400, Valerie Aurora Henson wrote:
> > In the default mode for ext3 and btrfs, fsync() is both slow and
> > unnecessary for some important application use cases - at the same
> > time that it is absolutely required for correctness for other modes of
> > ext3, ext4, XFS, etc. If applications could easilyl distinguish
> > between the two cases, they would be more likely to be correct and
> > fast.
> >
> > How about an fpathconf() variable, something like _PC_ORDERED? E.g.:
>
> Before we add any new fpathconf varibale we need a reall (f)pathconf(at)
> syscall so that the fs driver can exposed it's characteristics, having
> to replicate that information to glibc especially for something required
> for data integrity is a receipe for a desaster.
I think a real pathconf() is a great idea, regardless of the solution
for this exact problem. Anyone want to beat me to the patch? I
really need to be working on union mounts right now.
-VAL
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists