linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: upstream tree build warnings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1240505197.9646.517.camel@2710p.home>
Date:	Thu, 23 Apr 2009 10:46:37 -0600
From:	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...com>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	rusty@...tcorp.com.au, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: upstream tree build warnings

On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 22:51 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Dave,
> 
> On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 21:55:33 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >
> > The callers came in throught commit
> > 0bde95690d65653e420d04856c5d5783155c747c ("virtio_net: Add support for
> > VLAN filtering in the hypervisor") which I assume came in throught the
> > net tree (it has you SOB on it). Committed Feb 5, 2009, went into Linus'
> > tree before 2.6.30-rc1.
> > 
> > scatterlist.h hasn't changed since July, 2008.
> 
> In other words, I think the bug has always been there and just never hit
> (yet).

Hmm, I can't seem to get the warning on an x86_64 allyesconfig build
with gcc-4.4.0.  Did all the archs other than powerpc miss this warning?
Thanks,

Alex


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/