[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090423182928.GF6877@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 11:29:28 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, davem@...emloft.net,
dada1@...mosbay.com, zbr@...emap.net, jeff.chua.linux@...il.com,
paulus@...ba.org, laijs@...fujitsu.com, jengelh@...ozas.de,
r000n@...0n.net, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] v1 expedited "big hammer" RCU grace periods
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 08:47:02AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 23 Apr 2009, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >
> > Hmmm... I need to ask Jeff Chua what HZ he was running with. Because if
> > there was some read-side critical section soaking up 30 milliseconds,
> > all that hammering will do is slow things down...
>
> The original bug report comes from simply bootup:
>
> "I'm loading all the firewall rules during boot-up and this 6 secs
> slowness is really not very nice to wait for."
>
> IOW, the problematic case likely effectively has _nothing_ else going on.
> Sure, there might be some parallelism (the bootup scripts are getting
> better for that), but hopefully not 6 seconds worth, and not likely any
> complex critical sections.
Sounds good to me! ;-)
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists