[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200904231202.49465.david-b@pacbell.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:02:48 -0700
From: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
To: Alessandro Zummo <alessandro.zummo@...ertech.it>
Cc: rtc-linux@...glegroups.com, Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@....ocn.ne.jp>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
hcegtvedt@...el.com, vapier@...too.org, rongkai.zhan@...driver.com,
balajirrao@...nmoko.org, broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com
Subject: Re: [rtc-linux] Re: [PATCH] rtc: Make rtc_update_irq callable with irqs enabled
On Thursday 23 April 2009, Alessandro Zummo wrote:
> But first I need someone to validate the theory that
> says that we don't really need the IRQs to be disabled,
> as I stated in the email to Andrew.
>
> do you agree? :)
If (rtc_update_irq() starts disabling them locally,
&& its interface stops requiring callers to do that)
then
it's fine;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists