lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 23 Apr 2009 14:11:41 -0700
From:	Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
To:	Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>
Cc:	Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	stable@...nel.org, jejb@...nel.org,
	Justin Forbes <jmforbes@...uxtx.org>,
	Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@....linux.org.uk>,
	"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
	Chuck Wolber <chuckw@...ntumlinux.com>,
	Chris Wedgwood <reviews@...cw.f00f.org>,
	Michael Krufky <mkrufky@...uxtv.org>,
	Domenico Andreoli <cavokz@...il.com>, Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
	Rodrigo Rubira Branco <rbranco@...checkpoint.com>,
	Jake Edge <jake@....net>, Eugene Teo <eteo@...hat.com>,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Peter Lojkin <ia6432@...ox.ru>,
	Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [patch 057/100] posix-timers: fix RLIMIT_CPU && fork()

* Chuck Ebbert (cebbert@...hat.com) wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 00:21:17 -0700
> Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org> wrote:
> 
> > -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
> > ---------------------
> > 
> > From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
> > 
> > upstream commit: 6279a751fe096a21dc7704e918d570d3ff06e769
> > 
> 
> The following commit was also submitted:
> 
>    37bebc70d7ad4144c571d74500db3bb26ec0c0eb
>    posix timers: fix RLIMIT_CPU && fork()
> 
> Did it get dropped because it has the exact same title?

No, Oleg said to ignore it in favor to the two that are in 2.6.29.2.
That first one was an attempt at a quick and dirty fix for 2.6.29,
but it missed 2.6.29 proper.

thanks,
-chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ